Planning and land use policy
Wednesday, 21 March 2018
Planning and land use policy
Policy Key Facts
- One of the 12 core principles of England’s National Planning Framework (NPPF) states that planning should: “actively manage patterns of growth to make the fullest possible use of public transport, walking and cycling, and focus significant development in locations which are or can be made sustainable.” (NPPF Section 17)
- Just 2% of trips in the UK are made by cycle, compared to 10% in Germany, 16% in Denmark and 27% in the Netherlands. In these three countries, planning policies covering the use of land and the layout of urban areas make an important contribution to such high levels of cycling.
- NICE (The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) recommends that local authorities “Ensure planning applications for new developments always prioritise the need for people to be physically active as a routine part of their daily life.”
Cycling UK View
Planning policy and cycling
- Planning policies locally and nationally make a significant impact on travel patterns and travel choice. They need to complement and support transport policy and programmes to promote cycling and other healthy and sustainable options. They should include policies on:
- Cycle proofing all new or altered infrastructure associated with the development;
- Road safety;
- Locating development where it can be easily reached by walking, cycling and public transport;
- Supporting sustainable local transport strategies;
- Providing good cycle access to and within new developments;
- Ensuring the provision of cycle parking and other ‘trip end’ facilities (e.g. lockers and showers for employees etc.);
- Always adopting a travel plan as part of a wider planning agreement for developments and giving cycling a key role in it; and ensuring plans are implemented and well monitored;
- Securing appropriate developer contributions towards improved cycle provision in the surrounding area;
- Requiring high standard design for the public realm to create an environment that is inviting for pedestrians and cyclists;
- Considering the impact that planning decisions may have for recreational and utility cycling, particularly in relation to long distance routes, local green spaces, rights of way network, canals and riversides, disused railway lines and other transport corridors, forests, national trails & parks, AONBs and other areas that provide valued opportunities for outdoor activities and recreation;
- Ensuring that plans for the built environment contribute to improvements in public health.
Economic growth and local motor traffic restraint
- National guidance should recognise that the historic association of economic growth with the growth of motor traffic is inherently unsustainable. It should therefore state unambiguously that planning decisions should reduce the need to travel by private car; and that sustainable, healthy modes offer economic and other benefits in their own right.
- Local authorities should set out policies in their development plans that resist development projects that would increase car dependent travel patterns and/or enable them to secure developer contributions for measures that benefit cycling.
Climate change and low-carbon transport
- The Government should introduce ways to measure the specific carbon impacts of individual developments as part of the transport assessment process, and aggregate these so that the public can assess the overall impact of planning policies and decisions, both locally and nationally. It should be possible to dismiss plans on carbon grounds in the interests of achieving the legal limits set out in the Climate Change Act, and incentivise planners to ensure that low-carbon travel is properly accommodated.
- Representatives of relevant NGOs and local communities should always enjoy meaningful input into planning decisions and the policies and strategies that inform them. Consultation on planning applications for all proposals, major and minor, should be supported by clear information, transparency, regulations and guidance. Communities should also be granted a limited third party right of appeal against planning permissions to which they object.