Map Modification Orders (MMOs)

• Highway authorities should make resources available to ensure that the definitive map accurately represents the full bridleway and byway network before the ‘cut off date’ of 1 January 2026.  After this date, any unrecorded footpaths and bridleways created before 1949 cannot be recorded on the definitive map and will effectively lose public access.
• Cycling UK will normally oppose moves to downgrade or delete bridleways and byways, and support upgrading or creating them.
• As the current system is overly resource-intensive, the Government and its agencies should take steps to develop and implement more effective ways of making and confirming Orders.

Public Path Orders (PPOs)

• The needs of residents, landowners and businesses should be sympathetically considered whenever they want to make reasonable diversions around residential properties or farm buildings, or alter the line of a path so that it goes round the edge of field (headland), rather than across it (cross field).
• If, however, the diversion means that cyclists would suffer a loss of amenity, or usability (e.g. longer and/or steeper routes, poorer surfaces etc), Cycling UK is unlikely to support the proposal.
• Cycling UK will, however, normally oppose any proposed downgrades (e.g. downgrading a bridleway to a footpath that cyclists can no longer use).

Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs)

• Wherever possible, Cycling UK will liaise with highway authorities to seek alternative solutions to TROs on byways, bridleways or unsurfaced roads.
• Cycling UK will normally oppose any regular renewal of a temporary TRO, because remedies to deal with the problem in question should be the priority.