The Glasgow Community Cycling Network is very keen to promote as many cycling clubs as possible in order that families and children at the event can find out where their nearest cycling club is! Please email@example.com to register for a place.
Learn to Ride Extravaganza
23rd October 12pm – 4pm
249 Govan Road
On Sunday 23rd of October the GCCN will gather in “The Glasgow Caring City” warehouse in Govan where attendees will be able to sample the range of cycling services the city has to offer and take part in “Learn to Ride” activities.
On the day there will be a variety of cycling related activities including the Scottish Bike Trials who will be putting on displays throughout the day. Freewheel North will be bringing an assortment of bikes for the public to try out e.g. conference bike, side by side tandem, tricycle tandem, double handcrank, child and adult tricycles, quadricycles – which is all free for the public!
You can also bring your own bike and receive a free Dr Bike safety check: the mechanic’s will check over your bike, tightening up any loose nuts and bolts, and advise you if your bike needs any other parts replaced.
There will also be a skill track area and a practice area for everyone to practice on which is also free.
For those new to cycling there will be a series of Learn to Ride sessions aimed at different age groups:
- age 2 years old – 5 years old by Play on Pedals
- age 6 years old -12 years old lessons provided by South West Community Cycles
- age 12 years old – 40 years old lessons provided by The Glasgow Bike Station
- age 40 years old + lessons provided by Soul Riders
For Learn to Ride sessions booking in advance is required, please click on the link below:
The Learn to Ride event is for all ages and the areas for learning will be indoors so no need to worry about the weather while learning to ride a bike!! (Bikes will be provided in the learn to ride areas)
Refreshments will be available to purchase on the day.
Please feel free to pass on this email or the attached poster.
Great news! We’ve been nominated for The Herald Society’s Young People’s Project of the Year Award 2016.
We’re super excited to be nominated as this demonstrates the hard work and effort that the project partners have put into Play on Pedals and also the impact it is having upon preschool children across Glasgow.
The ceremony is in early November so cross all your fingers and toes for us!
I was taught the moon was made of cheese. It isn't. Somerset's roads are [emoji853]
Today, out for a ride, I counted 21 potholes between Tavistock town centre in the affluent county of Devon to the county border. 4.5miles of A390.
From the border over the bridge into the EU Objective One funded county of Cornwall to the village of Gunnislake, I counted 25 potholes. This is still the A390 but this distance is only half a mile.
Report 'em all??????
This is before I even count them on the minor roads.
They are too numerous to count.
Cornwall Council do seem to have a lot of money available for the up-keep of the highways. When I went back at Easter, on Good Friday there was a huge road sweeper cleaning a lane (which appeared pretty clean already) on the outskirts of Troon (population ~ 5000). Anything to do with double time?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-no ... e-36286775
No excuse for the totally irresponsible motorcyclist though.
Beyond that I responded to a repair on fill that hole via the email reply saying leave comments about the work done. I did as the repair was comlete rubbish, I then got an email from CTC saying the authority wouldn't have seen my response as they don't go through...... ehhh? So not sure about that part of it.
My problem is remembering where the ones I've reported were. If on a ride you report 10, then 10 next ride, 10 next, remembering to note in the 1st 10 have been repaired a month later is beyond me (without turning it into a massive administrative task).
Certainly on Fill My Hole website Norfolk were never marking any repairs they made as having been repaired. The site does have rankings, and I'd have thought the Council would be keen to look good on the rankings. But if they are not aware of the rankings or if the site has too low a profile or it is just a fiddle to make complete I guess the extra work isn't worthwhile.
The urban issue is interesting. cycle.travel already has a slight overall penalty for routes in cities, mostly to stop long-distance routes gratuitously swerving into cities where there are lots of traffic-free routes (e.g. Birmingham on LEJOG). Ultimately I'd like to "paint" each route with some sort of attractiveness score - so the Regent's Canal towpath, for example, is more attractive than the roadside path along the A4 in West London. But doing that with standard database queries is really slow. I think I know how I can do it, but it'll require some pretty complex coding. Would be fun though...
The road north from Maratea is much prettier.
So far I've looked at the new offering from Ortlieb and I've glanced over Alpkit's kit. This is for my Surly Big Dummy which essentially has a MTB set up in front hence deciding to post in this section.
Is @Bigdummysteve still out there?
Thanks in advance...b
Or, on the ss111, 200m SE of where it meets the ss18 is Barbaro Moto Yamaha, a moto shop with some pics of (pedal) bikes on exterior.
Via Strada Statale 111, 49, 89013 Gioia Tauro RC, Italy
I came upon a cycling blog saying how dreadful Rosarno was in 2015. Racial tensions, black guys on bikes, white guys in cars, piles of rubbish everywhere, just a bad scene. But if you get towards Maratea, things look up! http://www.bikemotorpoint.com/ seems like a good repair bet if you need one towards the end of day 2.
I report as many as I am confident of describing the accurately enough. Then the next ride I'll pick some more do it in bits on each ride but no need to stop. They'll not expect measurements, photographs or a truly accurate description.
I initially tried that but we have so many and remembering I was too "greedy"- I'd remember a few, see some worse ones and add those, then forget which corner the 5th one was on then see a really terrible one ...
In fact it was pretty bad even remembering which ones I had reported (when out riding) having used the Smartphone (as the app does/did not show you existing reports and so many re-appear within a month of repair. I ended up reporting a load in each direction, waiting a long enough to expect them repaired (or until I spotted recent repairs) then that direction was re-reported and if they got a duplicate then they should have fixed it on the previous report. (When you have reported lists at 300+ remembering them is too much for me.
Measurements can be important as my main local Highways have certain "thresholds" on repair times. From memory, if it was 4" deep then it took a higher priority than <4", etc. But I never exaggerated (you (and the system) would quickly lose credibility if you kept reporting it as a sinkhole and when they arrived they found a 6"x6"x0.5" hole. I tended to include my foot in the photos so they'd get an estimate of size and add a depth if it was 4" or deeper.
I don't know what the report to the Highways contains, but one great weakness of these systems is clearing down fixed holes. It would be great if the e-mail to Highways reporting the hazard also included a web link for them to click to record the hazard as fixed (bit like those registration verification e-mails. It it is real easy to clear the fault I'd hope they would take the few moments to improve their ranking in the system. This sort of think takes the operator of the system to communicate a bit with Highways. Ideally Highways would use Open311 systems which would make life easy to report and for people to check on progress.